NRC approves first new nuclear plant in 3 decades

Filed in superb Leave a comment

Southern Company Chairman, President and C.E.O. Thomas Fanning announces that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 4-1 to approve the Atlanta-based company’s request to build two nuclear reactors at its Vogtle site south of Augusta, during a news conference in Atlanta Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012. The NRC last approved construction of a nuclear plant in 1978, a year before a partial meltdown of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Southern Company Chairman, President and C.E.O. Thomas Fanning announces that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 4-1 to approve the Atlanta-based company’s request to build two nuclear reactors at its Vogtle site south of Augusta, during a news conference in Atlanta Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012. The NRC last approved construction of a nuclear plant in 1978, a year before a partial meltdown of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Southern Company Chairman, President and C.E.O. Thomas Fanning announces that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 4-1 to approve the Atlanta-based company’s request to build two nuclear reactors at its Vogtle site south of Augusta, during a news conference in Atlanta Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012. The NRC last approved construction of a nuclear plant in 1978, a year before a partial meltdown of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

(AP) ? The nation’s first new nuclear power plant in a generation won approval Thursday as federal regulators voted to grant a license for two new reactors at a site in eastern Georgia.

Atlanta-based Southern Co. hopes to begin operating the $14 billion reactors at its Vogtle site south of Augusta as soon as 2016. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the company’s plans on a 4-1 vote.

The NRC last approved construction of a nuclear plant in 1978, a year before a partial meltdown of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. After that accident, fears of a radiation release were heightened and new reactor orders were brought nearly to a halt.

The planned reactors, along with two others in South Carolina expected to win approval in coming months, are the remnants of a once-anticipated building boom that the power industry dubbed the “nuclear renaissance.” The head of an industry lobbying group said the Vogtle project could be the start of a smaller renaissance that expands nuclear power in the United States.

“This is a historic day,” said Marvin Fertel, president and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute. He said the NRC vote “sounds a clarion call to the world that the United States recognizes the importance of expanding nuclear energy as a key component of a low-carbon energy future that is central to job creation, diversity of electricity supply and energy security.”

President Barack Obama and other proponents say greater use of nuclear power could cut the nation’s reliance on fossil fuels and create energy without producing emissions blamed for global warming. The Obama administration has offered the Vogtle project $8.3 billion in federal loan guarantees as part of its pledge to expand nuclear power.

More than two dozen nuclear reactors have been proposed in recent years, but experts now say it is likely that only five or six new reactors will be completed by the end of the decade.

The once-expected nuclear power boom has been plagued by a series of problems, from the prolonged economic downturn to the sharp drop in the price of natural gas and the March 2011 nuclear disaster in Japan.

“It’s clear the nuclear renaissance has been significantly slowed,” said Edwin Lyman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a watchdog group. Lyman blamed what he called “inappropriate optimism” about nuclear power that ignores the huge start-up costs and safety risks.

The Vogtle project is considered by many observers to be a major test of whether the industry can build nuclear plants without the delays and cost overruns that plagued earlier rounds of building.

Close on the project’s heels is South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., which is seeking permission to build two reactors at an existing plant in Jenkinsville, S.C. In addition, construction of a second reactor at the Watts Bar nuclear plant in Tennessee is under way after years of delay.

NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko voted against the Vogtle license, saying he wanted a binding commitment from the company that it would make safety changes prompted by the Japan disaster.

“We’ve given them a license. They have not given us any commitment they will make these changes in the future,” Jaczko said.

The meltdown at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant led to a series of recommendations by the NRC to improve safety at the 104 commercial nuclear reactors in the U.S. The changes are intended to make the plants better prepared for incidents they were not initially designed to handle, such as prolonged power blackouts or damage to multiple reactors at the same time.

The changes are still being developed, though Jaczko said it is clear that they will be required by the NRC before the new reactors begin operating.

Despite his opposition to the license, Jaczko called the vote “historic” and a culmination of years of work by Southern Co. and the NRC.

Southern Company Chairman and CEO Thomas A. Fanning called the NRC vote “a monumental accomplishment for Southern Company, Georgia Power, our partners and the nuclear industry.”

Fanning said the company was “committed to bringing these units online to deliver clean, safe and reliable energy to our customers.”

The NRC license “creates a standard of performance there, and Southern Company expects to exceed it,” Fanning said.

Allison Fisher, an energy expert for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, called the NRC’s action ? less than a year after the Japan crisis ? a step in the wrong direction.

“It is inexplicable that we’ve chosen this moment in history to expand the use of a failed and dangerous technology,” she said.

While other countries such as Germany are reversing their commitment to nuclear power, “the U.S. is approving new reactors before the full suite of lessons from Japan has been learned and before new safety regulations that were recommended by a task force established after the meltdown crisis at Fukushima have been implemented,” Fisher said.

The NRC approved a new reactor design for the Vogtle plant in December. Utility companies in Florida and the Carolinas also plan new reactors that use the same design by Westinghouse Electric Co.

Jack Spencer, a nuclear expert for the conservative Heritage Foundation, called approval of the Vogtle project “good news,” but added: “I don’t think this is the beginning of a full-scale renaissance” for the nuclear industry.

“Too many questions remain” about nuclear waste, government regulation and development of nuclear technology, Spencer said.

___

Associated Press writer Kate Brumback in Atlanta contributed to this story.

__

Follow Matthew Daly’s energy coverage at twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2012-02-09-Nuclear%20Power/id-c7961a21d0bd4f24888baabc3fbae1b1

haley reinhart judgement day judgement day may 21 daily news i am legend er cher

, ,

Nuclear Reactor Incidents Are Reminders of Need for Preparedness (ContributorNetwork)

Filed in superb Leave a comment

A reactor at a Southern California nuclear power plant was shut down after a leak in a steam generator tube on Tuesday, Reuters reported. This incident came a day after WIFR reported a nuclear plant lost power and shut down in Byron, Ill., on Monday. While both incidents were determined to not be high emergency levels, they are reminders of the importance to include nuclear disaster planning in individual and family emergency plans.

* A shutdown of a nuclear power plant could potentially mean a loss of electricity service to customers.

* The most frightening hazard from a nuclear power plant accident is exposure to radiation. FEMA characterizes the most common type of radiation exposure is from a cloud of radioactive gases and particles that could form. This type of cloud could cause exposure through particles left on the ground, breathing or ingesting radioactive materials.

* FEMA characterizes the risk area around a nuclear disaster as two zones. Zone one is a 10-mile radius around the plant where an incident occurs. People within this zone could be harmed by direct exposure to radiation. Zone two is a 50-mile radius around the plant in which radioactive materials from an accident could cause contamination of crops, water supplies and livestock.

* Before a nuclear emergency, residents living near a power plant are urged to follow normal emergency planning and preparedness as they would for any other emergency such as an earthquake. Make a plan that would require evacuation, and prepare a kit full of needed supplies that include food, water, prescription meds, important paperwork and other necessities. Don’t forget your pets in your plan.

* If you live near a nuclear power plant, become familiar with emergency terms used to describe an incident.

* An “unusual incident” means a problem has occurred but there is no risk that will affect residents around the plant.

* “Alert” means a problem has occurred and small amounts of radiation could leak inside the plant but still no risk to residents around the plant.

* “Site Area Emergency” means residents in the zones around the plant might hear sirens from the plant and should listen to local television and radio stations for instructions and information.

* “General Emergency” is the highest alert level. This means radiation could leak from the plant and into the surrounding areas. Sirens will sound and residents are urged to listen carefully to instructions that will be broadcast on TV and radio. You should plan to act very quickly upon instructions during this alert level.

* Be prepared to act quickly, evacuate if necessary and move as far from a radiation source as possible. During an evacuation, close all car windows and vents, and recirculate air in your vehicle.

* If you are told to remain inside, turn off all air intakes in your home — air conditioning units, vents, fans and furnaces.

* Shield yourself and your family by going to a basement and/or placing dense material such as heavy plastic between yourself and the outside.

* If you are exposed to radiation, don’t waste time — follow decontamination procedures which include taking a thorough shower and placing exposed shoes and clothing into plastic bags which should then be sealed and put out of the way.

Tammy Lee Morris is certified as a Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) member and is a trained Skywarn Stormspotter through the National Weather Service. She has received interpretive training regarding the New Madrid Seismic Zone through EarthScope — a program of the National Science Foundation. She researches and writes about earthquakes, volcanoes, tornadoes, weather and other natural phenomena.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/environment/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20120201/us_ac/10914797_nuclear_reactor_incidents_are_reminders_of_need_for_preparedness

seve ballesteros samsung infuse mgm roses calvin klein twiggy greece

, ,

Serbia to buy back loss-making US Steel plant (AP)

Filed in superb Leave a comment

BELGRADE, Serbia ? Serbia’s government has agreed with U.S. Steel to buy back its loss-making plant in the Balkan country for a symbolic $1, with a goal to avoid its closure and the layoff of 5,400 of its workers, the prime minister said Friday.

Mirko Cvetkovic said the formal agreement with the Pittsburgh-based giant will be signed next Tuesday. There was no immediate confirmation from U.S. Steel, which bought the plant in Smederevo, about 60 kilometers (37 miles) southeast of Belgrade, for $33 million (euro25 million) in 2003.

U.S. Steel Serbia ? the Balkan country’s largest single exporter accounting for about 10 percent of its exports with $35 million (euro27 million) in 2010 ? was mulling turning off the second of its two blast furnaces because of mounting losses amid the economic crisis.

“We have no intention to remain the owners in a long run,” Cvetkovic said. “We plan to start looking for a strategic partner” to buy the plant.

Cvetkovic said the Americans decided to pull out because of the global economic downturn. He said that they are leaving behind about $250 million (euro190 million) in the factory’s assets.

“U.S. Steel decided to leave Serbia and we realized it would be easier to find a new partner if the plant continues to work,” he said.

Cvetkovic said the workers will not be fired, but did not specify what would happen with their salaries.

The Smederevo plant, which was operating far bellow its annual capacity of 2.2 million tons, recorded losses of $73 million (euro56 million) for the first nine months of last year.

U.S. Steel’s management cited the global economic downturn, anemic economy in southeastern Europe, high raw material costs and pressure from imports as the causes of the problem.

To reduce costs, the Serbian plant’s working week has already been cut to four days amid dropping global demand for its low grade steel.

U.S. Steel’s other factory in Slovakia has been more profitable because it makes higher-grade steel for the car industry.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120128/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_serbia_us_steel

eci skin san jose sharks james durbin rajinikanth sun news telugu news

, ,

Japan Says Stricken Nuclear Power Plant in Cold Shutdown

Filed in superb Leave a comment

News | Energy & Sustainability

Critics question the announcement, but a cold shutdown is when water used to cool nuclear fuel rods remains below boiling point, preventing the fuel from reheating


Image: Tepco

TOKYO (Reuters) – Japan declared its tsunami-stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant to be in cold shutdown on Friday, taking a major step to resolving the world’s worst nuclear crisis in 25 years but some critics questioned whether the plant was really under control.

The Fukushima Daiichi plant, 240 km (150 miles) northeast of Tokyo, was wrecked on March 11 by a huge earthquake and a towering tsunami which knocked out its cooling systems, triggering meltdowns, radiation leaks and mass evacuations.

In making the much-anticipated announcement, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda tried to draw a line under the most acute phase of the crisis and highlighted the next challenges: the clean-up and the safe dismantling of the plant, something the government says may take more than 30 years.

“The reactors have reached a state of cold shutdown,” Noda told a government nuclear emergency response meeting.

“A stable condition has been achieved,” he added, noting radiation levels at the boundary of the plant could now be kept at low levels, even in the event of “unforeseeable incidents.”

A cold shutdown is when water used to cool nuclear fuel rods remains below boiling point, preventing the fuel from reheating. One of the chief aims of the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), had been to bring the reactors to that state by the year-end.

The declaration of a cold shutdown could have repercussions well beyond the plant. It is a government pre-condition for allowing about 80,000 residents evacuated from within a 20 km (12 mile) radius of the plant to go home.

Both Noda and his environment and nuclear crisis minister Goshi Hosono said that while the government still faced huge challenges, the situation at the plant was under control.

That provoked an angry response from senior local officials, Greenpeace and some reporters even as the Vienna-based U.N. nuclear agency welcomed “significant progress” at the plant.

“We hope that this will be a fresh step towards going back home but it does not change the fact that the path to bringing the crisis under control is long and tough,” Fukushima governor Yuhei Sato said, according to the Asahi newspaper website.

Greenpeace dismissed the announcement as a publicity stunt.

“By triumphantly declaring a cold shutdown, the Japanese authorities are clearly anxious to give the impression that the crisis has come to an end, which is clearly not the case,” Greenpeace Japan said in a statement.

Hosono acknowledged that there were some areas where it would be difficult to bring people back and said there could be small difficulties here and there, but he told a briefing: “I believe there will be absolutely no situation in which problems escalate and nearby residents are forced to evacuate.”

The water temperature in all three of the affected reactors fell below boiling point by September, but Tepco had said it would declare a state of cold shutdown only once it was satisfied that the temperatures and the amount of radiation emitted from the plant remained stable.

Jonathan Cobb, an expert at the British-based World Nuclear Association, said the authorities had been conservative in choosing the timing of the announcement.

“The government has delayed declaration of cold shutdown conditions, one reason being to ensure that the situation at the plant was stable,” Cobb said, adding that the evacuation zone should get progressively smaller as more of it was decontaminated.

Kazuhiko Kudo, professor of nuclear engineering at Kyushu University, said authorities needed to determine exactly the status of melted fuel inside the reactors and stabilize a makeshift cooling system, which handles the tens of thousands of tons of contaminated water accumulated on-site.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=399a0ec798cf80661d7b163afa387814

pawn stars endometriosis jabbawockeez mash ruby ohio state football tupac

, ,

TOP